Eh, personally, I feel that the show attempted a bold move with a very Very complex story arc. But sometimes the story can become so complex that it becomes as draining for the television audience as it is for the characters on the show. So is it good that the audience is so ardently feeling the frustration and mental confusion that the characters are themselves? Eh, in a purely existential way, yes. But when it is presented in the form of, here is this hour long weekly program we want you to watch, but if you're going to eake out any relevance from it, then you have to solve (or wrap your head around) the show's mystery plot (which will be a task as tough for you as it is the characters on the show) - then yeah, I could see a lot of people bailing from Fringe if it keeps going this far down the Rabbit Hole. The only people left aren't even die hard fans but merely jokers who want their weekly fix of hour-long-mind-frack! So yeah, in a way I'm not disappointed in this season. This show was made for the college professor, or physics student, or primarily intellectual type. So happens I fit in at least two of those roles, so I'm on board till the wheels fall off! But yeah, in a previous post I had wished that they wrapped this whole new plot up within the first 6 shows and stop rehashing some ideas.
Just remember, introducing the Fibbonicci sequence as a plot device is cool up till the point that you realize it means rehashing old plot devices and slightly tweaking them...
And finally, how many households is 1.1 rating anyway? Does anyone know what the show's rating was at its best?


Reply With Quote





Bookmarks